Arithmic Documentation
  • Introduction
  • Gen 1.0 - Gen 2.0 VMs and Staking
    • Gen 1.0 VM and its Limitations
    • Gen 2.0 VM Paradigm
    • Recursion in Gen 1.0 and Gen 2.0 VMs
    • Staking & LSTs
    • Restaking & LRTs
  • Arithmic Gen 2.0 zkVM Soma: The future of zkEVMs
    • Soma System Design
    • Hardware Acceleration
    • Performance
    • Outperforming the Competition
  • Network Architecture
    • Nodes
    • Client and Explorer
    • Data Availability
    • Decentralized Sequencing
    • Computation & Decentralized Infrastructure
  • Arithmic Network's Staking Model
    • Problem of Fractured Incentives
    • Aligning Network Incentives
  • Arithmic’s Multichain Staking Pools (MSP)
    • How does an Arithmic MSP work?
      • Stable Hyper-Staked Token (sHST)
      • Equity Hyper-Staked Token (eHST)
      • MSP Example
    • Types of Staking Pools
  • Arithmic Rewards System
    • Earning Arithmic Points
    • Participating in Arithmic MSPs
  • Arithmic Network's Roadmap
  • Our Vision
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Gen 1.0 - Gen 2.0 VMs and Staking

Recursion in Gen 1.0 and Gen 2.0 VMs

Most VMs for validity roll-ups today employ recursion as a means to accelerate proof computations. Recursions enable a parallel prover architecture, where a system of provers forms a binary tree, and each prover node computes proofs attesting to the correctness of the proofs generated by its children. The proof computed by the prover acting as the root node attests to the correctness of the proofs computed by all the leaf nodes. Such a recursive architecture affords massive parallelism but in a Gen 1.0 VM, is limited by the tradeoff between algebraic and non-algebraic hashes. The overheads to computing proofs corresponding to algebraic hashes in a Gen 1.0 VM are significantly lower but computing an algebraic hash like Poseidon on off-the-shelf hardware is at least 100x slower compared to computing a non-algebraic hash like Keccak. Since hash computations are such a central part of SNARKs, this reduces the overall proof computation times at each layer when employed using a Gen 1.0 VM. In the context of Gen 2 VM, such a recursive architecture can be effectively employed using a non-algebraic hash like Keccak, offering massive speed gains.

PreviousGen 2.0 VM ParadigmNextStaking & LSTs

Last updated 1 year ago